![]() There’s a sunken power button on the back, presumably recessed to ensure no accidental presses, and the Micro USB port for charging is on that angled spine. The back is flat with a textured plastic finish that enhances grip slightly. The Libra H20 is finished in black or white plastic, it’s much thicker, the screen is recessed, and the page turn buttons sit on an angled spine that accentuates the feeling that you’re holding a book. ![]() There are some clear differences between the Libra H20 and the Kindle Oasis, though. The screen has a 1,680 x 1,264 resolution, which translates to 300 pixels-per-inch that’s exactly the same as the Oasis and it’s plenty sharp for comfortable reading. ![]() Hands On: Kobo’s Aura e-reader commands a premium for bookstore freedom Kobo’s new Aura H20 still survives a dip in the deep end, holds even more books It weighs 192 grams, just a hair heavier than Amazon’s device, but it boasts the same IPX8 certification, which means it can survive for up to an hour in two meters of water without sustaining damage. It’s a good size, though a tad too large to slip into most pockets. The Forma offers a larger 8-inch screen, but the Libra H20 sticks with 7 inches and is almost precisely the same size as the Oasis. Just like the Forma before it, the Kobo Libra H20 owes a design debt to the Kindle Oasis, Amazon’s high-end ebook reader. ![]() The question is whether Kobo had to cut too many corners to get that price down. What – you may wonder – makes the Libra H20 worth considering when these two excellent options already exist? At $170, the Kobo Libra H20 is $100 cheaper than the Forma and $80 cheaper than the Oasis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |